Proprietary Rights Notice for The Korean Journal of International Studies (KJIS) Online
The person using the KJIS Online may use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of content from this journal for non-commercial purpose.
ANY USE of the open access version of this Journal in whole or in part must include the customary bibliographic citation, including author and publisher attribution, date, article title, the KJIS, and the URL https://www.kjis.org/ and MUST include a copy of the copyright notice. If an original work is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated.
For any commercial use of material from the open access version of the journal, permission MUST be obtained from The Korean Association of International Studies (KAIS). E-mail: kjis@kjis.org
re-use by a non-author/third party/other publisher of parts of or all of an article or articles in another publication (journal or book) to be sold for commercial purposes
the proactive supply of multiple print or electronic copies of items taken from the Journal to third parties on a systematic basis for marketing purposes
re-use by an author of parts of or all of an article in other publications from commercial organizations
22-2 (August 2024)
Enforcement Credibility and Frequency of Negotiations in Civil Wars
Hojung Joo* and Taehee Whang**
* Hojung Joo(hjjoo@umich.edu) is a Ph.D. student in the Department of Political Science at the University of Michigan. She received her M.A. in Political Science from Yonsei University.
** Taehee Whang(thwhang@yonsei.ac.kr) is a Professor at the Department of Political Science and International Studies at Yonsei University. His work appears at American Journal of Political Science, British Journal of Political Science, International Organization, International Studies Quarterly, and Political Analysis.
The Korean Journal of International Studies Vol.17, No. 2 (August 2019), 235-266
In the section on page 248, the variable name was incorrectly stated.
The correct variable name should be:
Conflict duration and battle deaths may also increase the likelihood of negotiations but may contribute to prolonged negotiations processes as protracted and brutal wars leave deeper wounds that require more time for parties to heal.
Results section on pages 251-253 need to be revised since the interpretation of the logit stage of zero-inflated negative binomial model is incorrect. Conflict duration and cold war are positively correlated with negotiation non-occurrence, while peacekeeping (lag), rebel territorial control, battle deaths (log), and number of negotiations (lag) are negatively correlated with negotiation non-occurrence. In other words, conflict duration and cold war should be interpreted as reducing the likelihood of negotiation onset, while peacekeeping (lag), rebel territorial control, battle deaths (log), and number of negotiations (lag) should be interpreted as increasing the likelihood of negotiation onset.
Table 3 in page 252 needs to be revised since the results for negotiation onset have been interpreted incorrectly. Variables in the + column of the negotiation onset row should be on the - column of negotiation onset row, and variables in the - column of the negotiation onset row should be in the + column of the negotiation onset row.
In Tables 2, 4, A1, and A2, all the standard errors are shown as negative numbers, instead of positive values shown in a parenthesis.
In Tables 4 and A1, the beta coefficient value of Mediation by UN (lag) variable under Mediation Effect should be -0.342, not -342.